Twice a day, the ocean lifts and lowers billions of tons of water with clockwork precision. That moving mass is energy you can set your watch by, and it’s far denser than wind—water is roughly 800 times denser than air—so even a 2–3 m/s current packs serious punch. If you’ve wondered whether tidal lagoons or tidal stream turbines make more sense, you’re asking the right question. The two technologies harvest different parts of the same tide: one uses the height difference across a seawall, the other taps the speed of flowing water between headlands or through channels. The stakes are practical: cost, output shape, environmental footprint, and how easily the power fits the grid. You’ll get a clear comparison of how each system makes electricity, what kind of performance and maintenance to expect, where each shines, and pitfalls to avoid. This is the sort of insight you want before backing a project or judging a plan on the coast.
Quick Answer
Tidal lagoons generate electricity by trapping water behind a seawall and running it through low-head turbines as the water level inside and outside the lagoon differs during ebb and flood. Tidal stream turbines are underwater, free-flow devices placed in fast currents; they extract the kinetic energy of moving water much like wind turbines in air. Lagoons enable limited time-shifting and rely on civil works, while stream turbines offer higher capacity factors at prime sites with modular, scalable arrays.
Why This Matters
Tidal energy isn’t a lab curiosity—it’s one of the few renewables you can predict to the minute decades in advance. That matters for grid planners juggling variable wind and solar. A coastal city with a 200–300 MW tidal project can offset hundreds of thousands of tons of CO₂ per year, and do it on a timetable you can set your watch by.
A tidal lagoon can nudge its generation a few hours to hit the evening peak, providing a mini version of storage without batteries. That’s useful in places where peak power is pricey or where backup diesel still lurks. Tidal stream arrays, by contrast, can reach capacity factors around 35–45% at strong sites, delivering steady blocks of power through most of the lunar cycle—ideal for industrial loads or island grids starved of stable generation.
The choice affects coasts and communities. A lagoon reshapes a shoreline and intertidal habitat but creates breakwater protection and long-lived infrastructure. Stream turbines leave less of a visual mark but need rigorous marine operations and careful placement to protect wildlife. Get the choice wrong, and you can lock in decades of underperformance or avoidable ecological friction. Get it right, and you add predictable, durable power to the mix.
Step-by-Step Guide
Step 1: Understand the two resource types
Tidal lagoons use the potential energy created by the height difference (head) between water inside a walled basin and the open sea. Typical operating heads are 2–5 meters. Tidal stream turbines use the kinetic energy of moving water in channels, straits, or headlands where currents routinely exceed 2 m/s. You might find how do tidal lagoons generate electricity compared to tidal stream turbines kit helpful.
- Rule of thumb: stream power scales with the cube of current speed (v^3). A 3 m/s tide has over 3 times the power of a 2 m/s tide in the same cross-section.
- Lagoons gain most when local tidal range regularly exceeds ~4–5 meters.
Step 2: See how a tidal lagoon actually generates
A lagoon builds a seawall around a coastal basin and installs low-head, bi-directional turbines and sluice gates. During ebb operation, you hold water inside until the sea level outside falls, then run water out through turbines. During flood, you do the reverse. Many designs use two-way generation, sometimes with short pumping periods to increase head.
- Two-way generation smooths output over the day but usually reduces annual energy compared to ebb-only.
- Short pumping (1–2 hours per cycle) can add up to ~10% annual generation and improve timing to meet evening peaks.
- Expect capacity factors around 15–25% for proposed lagoons; for example, a 320 MW design was forecast for ~0.53 TWh/year (about 19% CF).
Step 3: See how tidal stream turbines work
Stream turbines are placed like underwater wind turbines, often 12–20 m diameter rotors rated 1–2 MW at ~3 m/s. Arrays are aligned in the main flow with spacing to manage wakes and bidirectional tides. Power electronics handle variable speed and direction.
- Top sites achieve 35–45% capacity factor, with some months surpassing 50% when tides align and availability is high.
- Tip speeds are typically 8–12 m/s, slower than wind equivalents, which helps reduce collision risk for marine life.
- Installation uses jack-up barges or dynamic positioning vessels; maintenance windows hit around slack tide.
Step 4: Compare grid fit and scheduling
Lagoons allow limited time-shifting within each tidal cycle: you can delay gate openings to align power with demand by 1–3 hours. This makes them more “shapable” than stream arrays, although total energy is lower for the same nameplate capacity. You might find how do tidal lagoons generate electricity compared to tidal stream turbines tool helpful.
- Stream arrays are less dispatchable but provide predictable blocks of power four times a day, with near-zero forecasting error.
- Both can provide reactive power and fast curtailment via power electronics.
Step 5: Evaluate environmental and siting trade-offs
Lagoons alter sediment transport and intertidal zones, which can affect bird feeding grounds and nursery habitats; mitigation may include habitat creation and adaptive gate schedules. Stream turbines have a smaller footprint but require careful monitoring for fish and marine mammals and must avoid key migration corridors.
- Use baseline surveys over at least one full spring–neap cycle.
- Consider noise, turbidity, and navigation safety; mark arrays and coordinate with maritime authorities.
Step 6: Balance costs, construction, and operations
Lagoons are heavy civil works with high upfront capex but design lives of 80–120 years; turbines and gates may need replacement every 20–30 years. Stream arrays are modular; you can start with a few MW and scale up as performance is proven. You might find how do tidal lagoons generate electricity compared to tidal stream turbines equipment helpful.
- Indicative early-stage capex ranges: lagoons often in the £3,000–6,000/kW band; stream arrays in the £4,000–7,000/kW band, with costs trending down as arrays scale.
- Harsh saltwater means robust corrosion protection, cable bend management, and redundancy in critical components for both approaches.
Expert Insights
If you’re thinking “tidal equals baseload,” adjust that mental model. It’s better than baseload—it’s predictable and phaseable. A lagoon can nudge output into peaks by changing when it opens gates, and a stream array gives reliable pulses you can schedule maintenance around. Operators aim to minimize unplanned downtime around springs when velocities (and revenue) are highest.
Common misconception: lagoons produce more energy just by adding more turbines. In reality, basin geometry, sluice sizing, and sedimentation control dominate. Too many turbines can shorten the head window and reduce total yield. Another misconception: stream turbines are “plug-and-play.” They’re simpler to permit visually, but moorings, biofouling, and bidirectional fatigue loads punish sloppy designs.
Pro tips: for lagoons, integrate pumping as a strategic tool, not an afterthought—time-shifting a few hours can materially lift revenues in peaky markets. Plan sediment management from day one; silt doesn’t politely wait. For stream arrays, invest in robust cable protection and strain relief; reversing tides flex cables twice daily and failures are costly. Accept that availability targets above ~95% require streamlined retrieval systems, standardized spare parts, and operations choreographed to slack water windows.
Quick Checklist
- Confirm tidal range or current speed with at least one full spring–neap measurement campaign.
- Model lagoon head dynamics with and without pumping to test revenue against demand peaks.
- For stream sites, verify sustained currents ≥2 m/s at hub height and map turbulence hotspots.
- Assess sediment transport and intertidal habitat changes for lagoon shorelines.
- Design corrosion protection, sealing, and cable bend limits for 20+ years in saltwater.
- Plan maintenance around slack tides and spring–neap cycles; pre-stage vessels and spares.
- Run array wake and blockage simulations to set turbine spacing and alignment.
- Engage fisheries and navigation stakeholders early to lock in safe transit corridors.
Recommended Tools
Recommended Tools for how do tidal lagoons generate electricity compared to tidal stream turbines
Frequently Asked Questions
How does a tidal lagoon actually make electricity?
It traps water inside a seawall and uses the difference in water level (head) between the basin and the open sea to drive low-head, bi-directional turbines. Operators open gates at chosen times during ebb and flood to either generate or, occasionally, pump to increase head and shift output toward demand peaks.
Do tidal stream turbines produce more energy than lagoons?
Per unit of installed capacity, top stream sites often achieve higher capacity factors—around 35–45%—because they tap fast currents directly. Lagoons commonly sit near 15–25% capacity factor. However, a well-sited lagoon can deliver more predictable time-shifted output and long-lived coastal infrastructure, so the “better” option depends on site and grid needs.
Can tidal power run 24/7 like baseload?
No. Tidal power follows the lunar cycle, producing multiple peaks and lulls each day with brief slack periods. The upside is extreme predictability; you can schedule other plants or storage to complement it. Lagoons can delay generation by a couple of hours within each tide, but neither technology is continuous all day.
What about impacts on marine life?
Lagoons change intertidal zones and sediment patterns, which affects shorebirds and nursery habitats; mitigation can include habitat creation and tuned gate schedules. Stream turbines have lower visual and shoreline impact but need monitoring for fish and marine mammals; low tip speeds and deterrents help, and careful siting avoids migration corridors.
Which is cheaper today: lagoon or stream?
Costs vary by site and scale. Early commercial stream arrays have shown falling costs as multiple turbines share installation and grid infrastructure. Lagoons require big upfront civil works but can last a century, spreading cost over time. Published estimates have placed both in the £90–200/MWh range depending on assumptions, with clear downward trends as projects scale.
Can a tidal lagoon store energy like a battery?
Not exactly. A lagoon can time-shift by holding or pumping to increase head and generate later in the tidal cycle, typically shifting by 1–3 hours. That provides valuable flexibility, but it’s not independent long-duration storage; it’s bounded by the tide’s timing and the basin’s hydraulics.
Conclusion
Tidal lagoons and tidal stream turbines harvest different faces of the same resource: one banks on height difference behind a seawall, the other leans into speed in natural channels. Lagoons trade higher civil cost for limited time-shifting and century-scale infrastructure; stream arrays offer modular growth and strong capacity factors at the best sites. Your next move is to match technology to the resource you actually have—range versus current—then stress-test the design for grid fit, maintenance windows, and environmental safeguards. Do that, and you’ll build tidal power that performs on paper and at sea.
Related: For comprehensive information about Energy Revolution, visit our main guide.